May 14th 2007
At the moment I'm lucky enough to have unrestricted access to a local farm where I am doing a pond survey. Whilst walking around the fields the difference between Ash and Oak leaf development this year has been striking.
Now a lot of foliage is much earlier than you would expect, as widely reported in the media:
Bluebells are finishing early, May blossom was a couple of weeks early and Lords and Ladies flowers are already dying.
Oak trees all around my home area and all over the farm are already in full leaf, doing extremely well and looking very healthy. The Ash trees however are looking very poor indeed, buds only just bursting and taking a long while to get to full leaf.
However it seems to be more serious than that, many trees on the farm, have buds and twigs that appear to be dead, the canopy seeming to have only 50% or so of the buds that are showing any signs of life.
Is this the same all over the county?
The old weather soar says:
"If the oaks before the ash,
you'll only have a splash,
if the ash is 'fore the oak,
you're in for a soak."
So, if the oak buds appeared first, the summer would be dry. If the ash appeared first, we were in for a damp summer. According to the Centre for Hydrology and Ecology back in the early years of their records (in the 18th century) Ash won the Spring bud race 40% of the time. Oak now wins 90% of the time.
Ash has shallower roots and so the oak does much better in drier conditions. In addition, the ash will lose out in a wood or slightly less so in a hedgerow, as the oak leaves, which have matured earlier, can then get more sun and use up more of the available water.
So will ash trees be dying this year? How are the trees in your area doing? Why not add a comment to this article and let us know.
Ilex
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This blog is for anyone interested in Natural History in Suffolk. Jot down your sightings, comments and observations for others to read and perhaps reply to.
The Blogmaster is also the webmaster for: Suffolk Naturalists SocietyRecording Suffolk's Wildlife since 1929.
Members of the SNS are most welcome to join in though we are happy to receive content from anyone out there,
but do please read the disclaimer at the foot of this column.
Just
click here to join.
Login
Permission is assumed for any posting to be used in part or as a whole in other SNS publications. The moderator reserves the right to remove any unsuitable or inappropriate content without warning & remove posting priviliges. Postings to this blog do not represent the policy or opinion of the SNS in any way. Neither the SNS nor it's officers will be held responsible for the conduct or content of externally organised field trips, events or websites, over which we have no control. All SNS organised events or websites are explicitly listed as such. Any genuine concerns about an article in this blog should be emailed to the SNS Blogmaster. |
Comments
Re: Ash trees on the decline?
by
Anonymous
on Tue 15 May 2007 18:11 BST | Permanent Link
I have noticed some of the ash trees in a bad way, I have a young one in my garden about 7 years old and that is very healthy looking. I did notice last year that the ash trees really did have alot of flowers.
Re: Ash trees on the decline?
by
David & Anne Kell
on Wed 16 May 2007 18:46 BST | Profile | Permanent Link
We too have noticed exactly the same around the county. Around Copdock it is very obvious that the Oaks were well in advance of the ash trees. Last weekend around Dunwich we noticed that the Ash was still barely in leaf and many branches appeared bare.
At first we could not decide if the as h was late or the oak early. However, as so many trees now seem to be in full leaf and blossom, the ash really stands out as being left behind. As the oaks were in leaf so early, have they avoided the usual loss of their first leaves by grazing larvae? |
This Month
Month Archive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||